Sunday, November 24, 2024

Okta vs. Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Lively Listing) 2024: IAM Software program Comparability

Staff right now are logging into increasingly purposes from a wide range of units and areas. This may create challenges for IT departments for safety and effectivity causes.

This all makes IAM options essential to any trendy enterprise, and two standard choices in that class are Okta and Microsoft Entra ID (previously Azure Lively Listing).

Okta vs. Microsoft Entra ID: Comparability

Okta is an IAM cloud-based resolution used to handle single sign-on internet purposes. As one of many pioneers within the IAM trade, the maturity of their product exhibits in its simple to make use of interface and streamlined implementation.

Previously often known as Azure Lively Listing, Microsoft Entra ID is a Home windows-centric IAM that’s extra suited to an enterprise surroundings the place entry to numerous community or firm property must be managed by a central IT division.

Options
Okta
Microsoft Entra ID
Person self-service portal
Sure
No
Constructed-in integrations
Sure
Sure
Person SSO app
Sure
No
Safety reporting
Sure
Sure
Passwordless sign-on choices
Sure
Sure


Okta and Microsoft Entra ID pricing

Each Okta and Microsoft Entra ID have varied plans relying on your corporation’ wants. For Okta, you’ll be able to customise your plan in keeping with what sort of Single Signal-on or Multi-factor authentication you require.

Under is a breakdown of its plans and a few of its included options:

Single Signal-on (SSO) Adaptive SSO
$2 per person, monthly $5 per person, monthly
  • Okta Integration community.
  • Customized org URLs.
  • SIEM integration.
  • All SSO options.
  • Location, machine, community contextual entry administration.
  • Danger-based Authentication.

Multi-factor Authentication (MFA) Adaptive MFA
$3 per person, monthly $6 per person, monthly
  • Safety questions.
  • Okta Confirm OTP.
  • Home windows Whats up and Apple TouchID.
  • All MFA options.
  • Location, machine, community contextual entry administration.
  • Community anonymizers.

Microsoft Entra ID divides its plans into 4: Entra ID Free, P1, P2 and Governance.

Right here is an summary of Microsoft Entra ID’s subscriptions and a few of their included options:

Entra ID Free Entra ID P1 Entra ID P2 Entra ID Governance
Free $6.00 per person, monthly $9 per person, monthly $7 per person, monthly
  • SSO limitless.
  • Cloud authentication.
  • Customizable person sign-in web page.
  • Partial MFA and conditional entry.
  • All Free options.
  • Group task to apps.
  • Cloud app discovery.
  • Full MFA and conditional entry.
  • All P2 options.
  • Id safety.
  • Full finish person self service.
Id governance.

Function comparability: Okta vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Contextual entry for multi-factor authentication

Okta and Microsoft Entra ID each have the flexibility to set contextual or conditional multi-factor authorization. This permits for various settings when new units, IPs or different situations are met upon login and set off multi-factor required login.

For Okta, it is a built-in function. With Microsoft Entra ID, this function is simply out there within the premium pricing tier, so it’s not a default choice.

Each Okta and Microsoft Entra ID provide deep customization on this space, with the flexibility to set a number of authorization ranges for various organizational and app ranges.

Person self-service portal

Each Okta and Microsoft Entra ID provide a manner for customers to handle their very own logins. With Microsoft Entra ID, it’s through the Microsoft Home windows Azure portal or the Home windows My Apps portal. Microsoft Entra ID may be very built-in with the present Microsoft ecosystem and expects customers to be conversant in the community.

Okta’s person portal is stand-alone and never tied to different inside providers. Many customers additionally report that it’s extra customizable and user-friendly than the Microsoft Entra ID model. Okta has a standalone app to handle logins on the go, so on this regard, the Okta model is extra versatile, particularly for these not already within the Microsoft Azure ecosystem.

Safety reviews

Safety reviews are a key factor of any IAM software. These can be utilized to trace vulnerabilities earlier than they’re exploited. Each Okta and Microsoft Entra ID provide detailed safety reviews, however as with different choices, Microsoft Entra ID solely affords these of their premium packages. Fundamental packages are restricted to solely reviews displaying dangerous sign-ins, with out the flexibility to drill down additional.

These two instruments are comparable, however in case you are operating a Safety Operations Middle, you’ll want the superior model of Microsoft Entra ID reporting to take full benefit of the useful resource.

Assist packages

Establishing both Okta or Microsoft Entra ID might be fairly totally different relying in your current infrastructure.

With Microsoft Entra ID, until your group is already closely invested within the Entra infrastructure, you’ll nearly definitely require a devoted assist plan along with Microsoft Entra ID with a view to absolutely get issues up and operating.

Alternatively, Okta might be applied by most organizations with no need extra assist past customary choices. This can be a key distinction for some organizations, relying on their measurement and the flexibility of their IT workers.

Okta execs and cons

Professionals of Okta

  • Constructed-in contextual entry for MFA.
  • Customizable person portal.
  • A number of integrations with third-party purposes.

Cons of Okta

  • May be buggy at occasions.
  • Could not work effectively with Microsoft apps.

Microsoft Entra ID execs and cons

Professionals of Microsoft Entra ID

  • Integrates effectively with different Microsoft merchandise.
  • Geared in direction of enterprise use.
  • Easy to know subscriptions.

Cons of Microsoft Entra ID

  • Contextual entry to MFA solely out there on premium tier.
  • No Person SSO software.

Methodology

Each Okta and Microsoft Entra ID had been assessed when it comes to their IAM capabilities. Specifically, we checked out how each dealt with account verification, function and privilege task, entry management, risk detection and reporting or auditing.

We then supplemented our findings with person opinions and testimonials from Gartner, G2 and TrustRadius to gauge how every resolution fared when it comes to person interface and general person expertise. Lastly, we assessed its function set in relation to its pricing and the way these IAM options built-in with several types of organizations.

Ought to your group use Okta or Microsoft Entra ID?

Each Okta and Microsoft Entra ID are very succesful and strong IAM instruments for SSO and person entry administration. The distinction actually comes all the way down to your wants and current community infrastructure.

For companies on the lookout for a streamlined and customizable SSO software to handle their workforce’s internet logins, Okta is probably going one of the best match. Its platform agnostic method, built-in integrations and ease of use make it an excellent choice. Regardless of being the better of the 2 to implement, it nonetheless boasts deep options like contextual multi-factor authorizations and complete safety reviews. Mix this with its pricing construction, and it makes for an excellent worth product as effectively.

Microsoft Entra ID is for enterprises already all-in with Entra ID and Microsoft. Microsoft Entra ID goes past Okta in relation to wants past simply internet login administration, akin to advanced developer environments the place entry to totally different providers and property is required. For this, Microsoft Entra ID does a a lot better job because it permits for elevated granular management of entry.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles